The Differences between the 3 Types of Military Court-Martial

By Joseph Low on January 2, 2013 - Comments off

The military judicial system, though still part of the federal government, has a procedure of its own in order to handle the unique circumstances under which crimes may have been committed in the course of military duty. When a military service member is accused of committing a crime, they may be subjected to one of three types of military court-marital to determine their innocence or guilt and to receive punishment. These three types are:

  1. Summary Courts-Martial
  2. Special Courts-Martial
  3. General Courts-Martial

The type of offense generally determines the type of court-martial and possible punishments.

Summary courts-martial are held for minor offenses allegedly committed by enlisted service members. A summary court-martial is held by one commissioned officer who does not necessarily need to be a lawyer and accused service members are usually not entitled to legal representation. If they do not consent to trial by summary court-martial, however, trial by special or general court-martial may be ordered. The maximum punishments that may be ordered as the result of a summary court-martial are 30 days of confinement, restriction to specified limits for 45 days, hard labor without confinement for 45 days, reduction to the lowest pay grade, and deduction of two-thirds pay per month for one month.

Special courts-martial are held to try a service member for any non-capital offense or capital offenses, under presidential regulation. Offenses typically tried by a special court-martial are considered misdemeanors. Special courts-martial proceedings may be presided over by a military judge alone, a panel of at least three members, or a judge and at least three members. The accused has the right to choose which. Two-thirds of the members must agree for a guilty verdict; if they don’t, the accused is acquitted. The maximum punishments ordered in special courts-martial are one year of confinement, loss of two-thirds pay every month for a year, hard labor without confinement for three months, pay grade reduction, and bad conduct discharge. The accused has the right to an attorney.

Finally, general courts-martial are used for the most serious offenses and are considered the highest trial level in military law. It includes a military judge alone, or a military judge and at least five members. An accused service member recommended to a general court-martial has the right to legal representation. The punishments ordered in a general court-martial vary by the offense, but may include reprimand, confinement, punitive discharge, fines, and possibly even death.

Facing a court-martial is a serious matter, but with the help of an experienced California military defense attorney, you can avoid unjust prosecution and/or excessive punishment. As a former Marine, military defense attorney Joseph H. Low IV understands what is at stake and is committed to defending your rights and your future.

Related Articles:

Posted in: Military Defense

100 Oceangate
12th Floor
Long Beach, CA 90802

Phone: (562) 901-0840
Toll-Free: (888) 454-5569

See all offices

Copyright © 2018 The Law Firm of Joseph H. Low, IV - Attorneys for The People - All rights reserved.

Disclaimer: The legal information presented on this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Any results portrayed here were dependent on the facts of a particular legal matter and results vary from case to case. Please contact Joseph H. Low IV for a consultation on your particular case. This firm is licensed to practice law only in the State of California, but is affiliated with licensed attorneys in other states.

Website and Legal Internet Marketing by SLS Consulting | blog sitemap